黄婉婷, 曾维忠, 龚荣发, 陈文宽. 2017: 基于物元评价模型的农机合作社绩效评价. 南方农业学报, 48(6): 1119-1124. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.06.29
引用本文: 黄婉婷, 曾维忠, 龚荣发, 陈文宽. 2017: 基于物元评价模型的农机合作社绩效评价. 南方农业学报, 48(6): 1119-1124. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.06.29
HUANG Wan-ting, ZENG Wei-zhong, GONG Rong-fa, CHEN Wen-kuan. 2017: Performance of agricultural machinery cooperatives based on matter-element evaluation model. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 48(6): 1119-1124. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.06.29
Citation: HUANG Wan-ting, ZENG Wei-zhong, GONG Rong-fa, CHEN Wen-kuan. 2017: Performance of agricultural machinery cooperatives based on matter-element evaluation model. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 48(6): 1119-1124. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.06.29

基于物元评价模型的农机合作社绩效评价

Performance of agricultural machinery cooperatives based on matter-element evaluation model

  • 摘要: 目的构建农机合作社绩效评价指标体系,探讨绩效水平的影响因素,为深化农机合作社发展和研究提供理论指导.方法基于过程思维的评价理论,构建"流程逻辑"指标体系,以四川省12家农机合作社为研究对象,从投入、过程、产出和效益4个维度,采用物元评价模型分析农机合作社发展绩效,并探索农机合作社绩效水平的影响因素.结果根据物元评价模型可知,12家农机合作社中优秀等级1家、良好等级5家、一般等级4家、较差等级2家,出现两头小中间大的格局,合作社之间差异较明显.在不同维度指标中,过程维度和产出维度的绩效等级较低,而效益维度和投入维度较高;虽然单从效益维度分析发现农机合作社的绩效水平较高,但综合其他维度分析,表现出组织管理存在缺陷、产出较低、对政府存在高度的资金依赖和政策依赖及农户参与度不高等问题.建议创新金融服务模式,拓展农机合作社的融资渠道,减少农机合作社对政府的资金依赖;加强政府监管力度,健全与完善管理制度和利益分配制度;引导开展适度规模化经营,提高农业生产效率.

     

    Abstract: ObjectiveAgricultural machinery cooperatives performance evaluation indicator system was established, influencing factors of performance levels were discussed in order to provide reference for development and research of agri-cultural machinery cooperatives. Method"Process logic" index system was established based on evaluation theory of pro-cess of thinking. Twelve agricultural machinery cooperatives in Sichuan Province were selected as research object. Ma-tter-element evaluation model was used to analyze the performance of agricultural machinery cooperatives from four dimen-sions(input, process, output and efficiency), and explore the factors affecting the level of performance. ResultThe re-sults indicated that, among 12 agricultural machinery cooperatives, there were one at excellent level, five at good level, four at general level and two at poor level, which showed an unbalanced pattern. It was inferred that the difference between the cooperatives were obvious. In different dimension indicators, process dimension and output dimension had low perfor-mance level, that of benefit dimension and input dimension were higher. Although the performance level of the agricultural machinery cooperatives was high from the efficiency dimension analysis, analysis based on other dimensions reflected some problems, such as flawed organizational management, low output, a high degree of financial dependence and policy dependence on the government and low farmers' participation. SuggestionFollowing suggestions are proposed: innovating the model of financial services to expand financing channels of agricultural machinery cooperatives and reduce the depen-dence degree on government's finance support; strengthening governmental supervision to improve and complete the mana-gement system and benefits distribution system; guiding the operation of appropriate scale management to improve agricul-tural production efficiency.

     

/

返回文章
返回