邵宁, 徐秀峰, 万永华, 李晓, 江雪彬, 周利军, 张明亚, 姚二民. 2017: 卷烟烟丝结构分布及其与物理质量的关系. 南方农业学报, 48(5): 883-888. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.05.021
引用本文: 邵宁, 徐秀峰, 万永华, 李晓, 江雪彬, 周利军, 张明亚, 姚二民. 2017: 卷烟烟丝结构分布及其与物理质量的关系. 南方农业学报, 48(5): 883-888. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.05.021
SHAO Ning, XU Xiu-feng, WAN Yong-hua, LI Xiao, JIANG Xue-bin, ZHOU Li-jun, ZHANG Ming-ya, YAO Er-min. 2017: Cut tobacco structure distribution and its relation with physical quality. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 48(5): 883-888. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.05.021
Citation: SHAO Ning, XU Xiu-feng, WAN Yong-hua, LI Xiao, JIANG Xue-bin, ZHOU Li-jun, ZHANG Ming-ya, YAO Er-min. 2017: Cut tobacco structure distribution and its relation with physical quality. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 48(5): 883-888. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.05.021

卷烟烟丝结构分布及其与物理质量的关系

Cut tobacco structure distribution and its relation with physical quality

  • 摘要: 目的研究不同档次卷烟的烟丝结构分布及其对卷烟物理质量的影响,为优化烟丝结构以提高卷烟质量提供参考依据.方法采用主成分分析法对A(低)、B(中)、C(高)3个档次牌号卷烟的烟丝结构比率层进行分析,确定主成分数量并得到各烟丝结构比率层的载荷值;再对烟丝结构与卷烟物理指标进行相关性分析,得出烟丝结构与物理质量的关系.结果3个品牌卷烟烟丝结构具有差异性,各档次卷烟烟丝结构可简化为两个主成分,累积方差贡献率均在80.000%以上,分别为80.689%(低)、83.982%(中)和84.001%(高),能够代表原始8层烟丝结构比率层的数据信息.对低档次卷烟物理质量影响较大的是居于主成分1的2.80~4.75 mm和≤2.00 mm烟丝;对中、高档次卷烟物理质量影响较大的是居于主成分1的2.00~3.35 mm和≤1.00 mm烟丝.结论不同档次卷烟的烟丝结构分布存在差异,烟丝结构对卷烟物理质量的影响也不同;在实际生产中,卷烟企业可针对性地优化不同档次卷烟烟丝结构,以提高卷烟质量及其稳定性.对于低档卷烟,可提升中长丝比率,减少碎丝比率;对于中、高档卷烟,可控制长丝比率,降低长丝对整体卷烟品质造成的负面影响.

     

    Abstract: ObjectiveDistribution of different-grade cut tobacco structure and its effects on cigarette quality were studied in order to provide reference for optimizing tobacco structure to improve the quality of cigarettes. MethodThrough principal component analysis, number of principal components and load values of each layer structure of low-(A), medi-um-(B) and high-class(C) were determined. Correlation analysis between cut tobacco structure and physical indexes for cigarette were conducted to explore the relation between cut tobacco structure and physical quality. ResultThe structure of cigarettes of three brands were different. The structure of each cigarette could be simplified into two principal components , and all the cumulative variance contribution rate were more than 80.000%, and were 80.689%(low class), 83.982%(medium class) and 84.001%(high class) respectively. These data could represent the original eight layers of tobacco layer structure ratio. The main factors affecting the physical quality of low-class cigarettes were cut tobacco at 2.80-4.75 mm and ≤2.00 mm in main component 1; those affecting the physical quality of medium- and high-class cigarettes were cut tobacco at 2.00-3.35 mm and ≤1.00 mm in main component 1. ConclusionCut tobacco structure distributions in different-class cigarette are different, and the effects of cut tobacco structure on cigarette quality are different. In actual production, the enterprises can optimize cut tobacco structure in different-class cigarettes to improve the quality and stability. For low-class cigarette, the proportion of medium and long cut tobacco should be increased and that of short cut tobacco should be de-creased. In terms of medium- and high-class cigarettes, the proportion of long cut tobacco should be controlled to reduce the negative effects of long cut tobacco on overall cigarette quality.

     

/

返回文章
返回