不同施肥模式对云南芒果园土壤养分及芒果品质的影响

王灿, 何腾兵, 杨志勇, 陈爱容, 何忠芹, 杨雍康, 郭艳红, 李春华

王灿, 何腾兵, 杨志勇, 陈爱容, 何忠芹, 杨雍康, 郭艳红, 李春华. 2025: 不同施肥模式对云南芒果园土壤养分及芒果品质的影响. 南方农业学报, 56(2): 592-600. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2025.02.023
引用本文: 王灿, 何腾兵, 杨志勇, 陈爱容, 何忠芹, 杨雍康, 郭艳红, 李春华. 2025: 不同施肥模式对云南芒果园土壤养分及芒果品质的影响. 南方农业学报, 56(2): 592-600. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2025.02.023
WANG Can, HE Teng-bing, YANG Zhi-yong, CHEN Ai-rong, HE Zhong-qin, YANG Yong-kang, GUO Yan-hong, LI Chun-hua. 2025: Effects of various fertilization modes on soil nutrients and mango quality of Yunnan mango orchard. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 56(2): 592-600. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2025.02.023
Citation: WANG Can, HE Teng-bing, YANG Zhi-yong, CHEN Ai-rong, HE Zhong-qin, YANG Yong-kang, GUO Yan-hong, LI Chun-hua. 2025: Effects of various fertilization modes on soil nutrients and mango quality of Yunnan mango orchard. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 56(2): 592-600. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2025.02.023

不同施肥模式对云南芒果园土壤养分及芒果品质的影响

基金项目: 

国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD1901505)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    王灿(1995-),https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6172-2897,主要从事农业环境保护研究工作,E-mail:18275567341@163.com

    通讯作者:

    杨志勇(1983-),https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4951-9544,高级农艺师,主要从事农业环境监测与资源保护研究工作,E-mail:ljnhz123@163.com

  • 中图分类号: S667.7

Effects of various fertilization modes on soil nutrients and mango quality of Yunnan mango orchard

Funds: 

National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFD1901505)

  • 摘要: 【目的】 研究不同施肥模式对滇西北芒果园土壤养分及芒果品质的影响,为改进芒果园的肥料管理、提升芒果品质及促进芒果产业的绿色发展提供参考。【方法】 以凯特芒果品种8年生果树为研究对象,设常规施肥、复合肥、有机水溶肥和生物菌肥4个施肥处理并开展田间试验,芒果成熟期取样测定分析土壤pH和养分指标及芒果品质指标,并进行相关分析与主成分分析。【结果】 不同施肥处理对土壤pH无显著影响(P>0.05);与常规施肥相比,有机水溶肥与生物菌肥处理均能有效提高土壤肥力,生物菌肥处理的土壤有机质含量显著提高30.05%(P<0.05,下同),有机水溶肥处理的土壤有效磷含量显著提高134.37%。有机水溶肥和生物菌肥处理的芒果品质也有明显提高,与常规施肥处理相比,维生素C含量分别显著提高54.98%和49.76%;此外,生物菌肥处理的可溶性固形物、可滴定酸、果糖和葡萄糖含量也较常规施肥处理有所增加。相关分析结果表明,土壤有机质与芒果维生素C含量呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),与可溶性固形物含量呈显著正相关;土壤有效磷含量与芒果总酸和可滴定酸含量呈显著正相关。主成分分析结果表明,总糖、维生素C和蔗糖含量是影响芒果品质的关键因子。【结论】 综合分析果园土壤肥力及芒果品质,施用生物菌肥是较适宜滇西北地区培肥果园土壤、提高芒果品质的施肥模式。
    Abstract: 【Objective】 This study aimed to study the effects of different fertilization modes on soil nutrients and mango quality in mango orchards in northwestern Yunnan,providing reference for improving fertilizer management,enhancing mango quality and promoting green development of mango industry.【Method】Taking the 8-year-old Kent mango variety as the research object,4 fertilization treatments including conventional fertilization,compound fertilizer,organic water-soluble fertilizer and biological bacterial fertilizer were set up and field experiments were conducted.The soil pH,nutrients indicators and mango quality indicators were analyzed by sampling at mango maturity stage,and correlation analysis and principal component analysis were carried out. 【Result】 Different fertilization treatments had no significant effects on soil pH(P>0.05);compared with conventional fertilization,both organic water-soluble fertilizer and biological bacterial fertilizer treatments could effectively improve soil fertility.The soil organic matter content in biological bacterial fertilizer treatment significantly increased by 30.05%(P<0.05,the same below),and the soil available phosphorus content in organic water-soluble fertilizer treatment significantly increased by 134.37%.The quality of mangoes treated with organic water-soluble fertilizer and biological bacterial fertilizer also showed obvious improvement.Compared with conventional fertilization treatment,the vitamin C content increased significantly by 54.98% and 49.76% respectively.In addition,the soluble solids,titratable acids,fructose and glucose contents in biological bacterial fertilizer treatment increased compared to conventional fertilization treatment.The correlation analysis results showed that soil organic matter was extremely significantly and positively correlated with mango vitamin C content(P<0.01),significantly and positively correlated with soluble solids content.The available phosphorus content in soil was significantly and positively correlated with the total acid and titratable acid contents of mango.The results of principal component analysis indicated that total sugar,vitamin C and sucrose contents were key factors affecting mango quality. 【Conclusion】 Based on a comprehensive analysis of soil fertility and mango quality in orchards,the application of biological bacterial fertilizer is a more suitable fertilization mode for fertilizing orchard soil and improving mango quality in northwestern Yunnan.
  • 胡小璇,江尚焘,安祥瑞,吴文利,谢昶琰,沈宗专,王蓓蓓,魏志远,徐阳春,董彩霞,沈其荣.2020.有机无机肥配施对芒果产量与品质及经济效益的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,43(6):1107-1115.[Hu X X,Jiang S T,An X R,Wu W L,Xie C Y,Shen Z Z,Wang B B,Wei Z Y,Xu Y C,Dong C X,Shen Q R.2020.Effects of combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on mango yield,quality and economic benefit[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University,43(6):1107-1115.]doi: 10.7685/jnau.202003024.
    黄洁雪,王晓琳,邬劼,乔玉山,吉沐祥.2024.化肥减施配施土壤调理剂对草莓品质和土壤养分的影响[J].江苏农业学报,40(1):55-63.[Huang J X,Wang X L,Wu J,Qiao YS,Ji M X.2024.Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with soil conditioner application on strawberry quality and soil nutrien[tJ].Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences,40(1):55-63.]doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.01.006.
    靳晓拓,马继勇,周彦妤,陈丽君,李涛,赵洪伟.2019.化肥减量配施有机肥下芒果园土壤细菌多样性及群落结构特征[J].热带作物学报,40(6):1205-1212.[Jin X T,Ma JY,Zhou Y Y,Chen L J,Li T,Zhao H W.2019.Bacterial diversity and community structure characteristics of mango orchard soil under reduced chemical fertilizer and increased organic fertilizer application[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops,40(6):1205-1212.]doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.06.024.
    李辉,刘小勇,任静,韩富军,陈佰鸿.2021.生物质炭基肥对旱塬区苹果叶片营养和果实品质的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,56(2):68-75.[Li H,Liu X Y,Ren J,Han F J,Chen B H.2021.Effects of biochar fertilizer on leaf nutrition and fruit quality of the apple in semi-arid regions[J].Journal of Gansu Agricultural University,56(2):68-75.]doi: 10.13432/j.cnki.jgsau.2021.02.009.
    李显伟.2022.华坪县芒果产业农企利益联结机制研究[D].昆明:云南师范大学.[Li X W.2022.Research on the interest connection mechanism of agricultural enterprises in Huaping County[D].Kunming:Yunnan Normal University.]doi: 10.27459/d.cnki.gynfc.2022.000529.
    刘家友,杨国宝,王齐龙,李学文,萧洪东,施卫明,喻敏.2023.减氮配施中微量元素肥对冬瓜产量和品质的影响[J].土壤,55(1):30-36.[Liu J Y,Yang G B,Wang Q L,Li X W,Xiao H D,Shi W M,Yu M.2023.Effects of combined application of medium and trace fertilizers on yield and quality of wax gourd[J].Soils,55(1):30-36.]doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2023.01.004.
    罗玲,潘宏兵,钟奇,杜邦,李贵利,刘伟.2021.石灰和有机肥对芒果园酸性土壤的改良效果及对芒果品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,(3):169-177.[Luo L,Pan H B,Zhong Q,Du B,Li G L,Liu W.2021.Effects of lime and organic fertilizer on acid soil of mango plantation and mango quality[J].Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China,(3):169-177.]doi: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.20127.
    彭有亮,费良军,刘小刚,孙光照,王秀康.2022.减量施肥耦合调亏灌溉对干热区芒果产量和品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,28(3):521-531.[Peng Y L,Fei L J,Liu XG,Sun G Z,Wang X K.2022.Effect of reduced fertilization and regulated deficit irrigation coupling on yield and quality of mango in a dry-hot region[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers,28(3):521-531.]doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2021400.
    秦广利,崔保伟,杜保伟,陈东阳,朱俊朋.2023.有机物料配施生物菌肥对豫东黄潮土壤质量及花生产量的影响[J].江苏农业科学,51(19):222-228.[Qin G L,Cui B W,Du B W,Chen D Y,Zhu J P.2023.Impacts of organic materials combined with biological fertilizer on soil quality and peanut yield in yellow-tide soils of eastern Henan[J]Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,51(19):222-228.]doi: 1015889/j.issn.1002-1302.2023.19.032.
    史宗源.2023.减施化肥增施生物肥对色素万寿菊生长及根际土壤环境的影响[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学.[Shi Z Y.2023.Effects of reducing chemical fertilizer and increasing biological fertilizer on growth and rhizosphere soil environment of pigment marigold[D].Urumqi:Xinjiang Agricultural University.]doi: 10.27431/d.cnki.gxnyu.2022.000890.
    万连杰,何满,李俊杰,田洋,张绩,郑永强,吕强,谢让金,马岩岩,邓烈,易时来.2022.有机肥替代部分化肥对椪柑生长、品质及土壤特性的影响[J].中国农业科学,55(15):2988-3001.[Wan L J,He M,Li J J,Tian Y,Zhang J,Zheng Y Q,LüQ,Xie R J,Ma Y Y,Deng L,Yi S L.2022.Effects of partial substitution of chemical fertilizer by organic fertilizer on ponkan growth and quality as well as soil properties[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,55(15):2988-3001.]doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.15.010.
    王锋堂,杨福孙,陈才志,李培征,卜贤盼,纠凤凤.2019.不同中微量元素对槟榔结果与产量特征的影响[J].热带作物学报,40(5):857-863.[Wang F T,Yang F S,Chen C Z,Li P Z,Bu X P,Jiu F F.2019.Effects of different medium and trace elements on Areca catechu L.results and yield characteristics[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops,40(5):857-863.]doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.05.004.
    王烁衡,林电,张鹏,范声浓,孟鑫,林一凡,王瑞,吴昊,程宁宁.2022.水肥一体化条件下化肥减施对芒果园土壤肥力的影响[J].中国果树,(6):39-48.[Wang S H,Lin D,Zhang P,Fan S N,Meng X,Lin Y F,Wang R,Wu H,Cheng N N.2022.Effect of reduced of chemical fertilizers application on soil fertility in mango orchards under the integrated water water and fertilizer conditions[J].China Fruits,(6):39-48.]doi: 10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2022.06.007.
    于占东,刘云峰,温丹,王晓,孙凯宁,王克安,杨宁.2022.有机肥配施生物菌肥对设施蔬菜土壤改良及面条菜生长、品质的影响[J].山东农业科学,54(8):99-103.[Yu Z D,Liu Y F,Wen D,Wang X,Sun K N,Wang K A,Yang N.2022.Effect of organic fertilizer combined with biological bacterial fertilizer on facility soil improvement and growth and quality of Silene conoidea L.[J].Shandong Agricultural Science,54(8):99-103.]doi: 10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2022.08.015.
    张秀志,郭甜丽,焦学艺,刘晨露,李宇星,马锋旺,符轩畅,李翠英.2022.商品有机肥配施对果园土壤肥力和“蜜脆”苹果果实品质的影响[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),44(1):65-74.[Zhang X Z,Guo T L,Jiao X Y,Liu C L,Li Y X,Ma F W,Fu X C,Li C Y.2022.Effects of combined application of commercial organic fertilizer on soil fertility and fruit quality of‘Honeycrisp’apple[J].Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science),44(1):65-74.]doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2022.01.007.
    张燕,刘清国,段军娜,黄海.2023.不同肥料对芒果品质的影响[J].农业技术与装备,(1):7-9.[Zhang Y,Liu Q G,Duan J N,Huang H.2023.Effect of different fertilizers on mango quality[J]Agricultural Technology&Equipment,(1):7-9.]doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-887x.2023.01.002.
    赵晨光,牛司耘,陈勋,方丽,李海涛,王佩星,沈镔镔,石元值.2022.复合肥料对茶叶产量、品质及茶园土壤肥力的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,24(6):206-217.[Zhao CG,Niu S Y,Chen X,Fang L,Li H T,Wang P X,Shen BB,Shi Y Z.2022.Effects of compound fertilizer on tea yield,quality and fertility of tea garden soi[lJ].Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,24(6):206-217.]doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0304.
    赵管乐,刘勤,彭培好.2022.基于Sentinel-2影像与MaxEnt模型识别云南华坪县芒果种植区[J].中国农业科技导报,24(3):111-119.[Zhao G Y,Liu Q,Peng P H.2022.Identification of mango planting regions in Huaping County,Yunnan Province based on Sentinel-2 images and MaxEnt model[J].Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,24(3):111-119.]doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0409.
    周群.2023.新型生物菌肥和酶肥对苹果养分吸收及果实品质的影响[D].阿拉尔:塔里木大学.[Zhou Q.2023.Effects of new biomicrobial fertilizer and enzyme fertilizer on nutrient absorption and fruit quality of apple[D].Alaer:Tarim University.]doi: 10.27708/d.cnki.gtlmd.2023.000332.

    Mi S,Zhang X N,Wang Y H,Ma Y D,Sang Y X,Wang X H.2022.Effect of different fertilizers on the physicochemical properties,chemical element and volatile composition of cucumbers[J].Food Chemistry,367:130667.doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130667.

    Shivran M,Sharma N,Sharma N,Muthusamy V,Dubey A K,Singh S K,Singh B P,Kumar N,Sevanthi A M,Singh N,Singh N K.2023.Development of ripening gene-specific markers and their association with shelf-life in mango(Mangifera indica L.) varietie[sJ].National Academy Science Letters,46:179-184.doi: 10.1007/S40009-023-01207-0.

    Silber A,Goldberg T,Shapira O,Hochberg U.2022.Nitrogen uptake and macronutrients distribution in mango (Mangifera indica L.cv.Keitt) trees[J].Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,181:23-32.doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.03.036.

    Tang Q,Cotton A,Wei Z J,Xia Y Q,Daniell T,Yan X Y.2022.How does partial substitution of chemical fertiliser with organic forms increase sustainability of agricultural production?[J].Science of the Total Environment,803:149933.doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149933.

    Wei J Y,Liu G Y,Liu D B,Chen Y Y.2017.Influence of irrigation during the growth stage on yield and quality in mango(Mangifera indica L)[J].PLoS One,12(4):e0174498.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174498.

    Zhou S W,Su S,Meng L,Liu X,Zhang H Y,Bi X L.2021.Potentially toxic trace element pollution in long-term fertilized agricultural soils in China:A meta-analysis[J].Science of the Total Environment,789:147967.doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147967.

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-07-04

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回