Defence response of local rice variety Acuce in Hani terraced fields in Yunnan against the feeding of Sogatella furcifera
-
摘要: 【目的】研究云南元阳哈尼梯田水稻地方品种月亮谷对白背飞虱取食胁迫的主要防御反应，明确月亮谷抗白背飞虱机制，为水稻抗虫育种及抗虫种质资源利用提供科学依据。【方法】以元阳地方水稻品种月亮谷、感虫水稻品种Taichung Native 1（TN1）和抗虫品种Rathu Heenati（RHT）为材料，采用比色法测定3个水稻品种在白背飞虱取食胁迫0、3、6、12、24、48、72和96 h后稻株内营养物质可溶性糖、次生产物丙二醛（MDA）和过氧化氢（H2O2）含量及保护酶过氧化物酶（POD）、苯丙氨酸解氨酶（PAL）和过氧化氢酶（CAT）活性。【结果】白背飞虱取食胁迫3～96 h后，月亮谷稻株内可溶性糖平均含量增加率为93.19%，显著小于TN1（176.23%）（P< 0.05，下同），而与RHT（89.16%）无显著差异（P> 0.05，下同）；H2O2平均含量增加率为44.13%，显著高于TN1（13.18%），而显著低于RHT（83.01%）；MDA平均含量增加率为145.38%，显著高于TN1（36.84%）和RHT（57.06%）；POD、CAT和PAL活性均增加，其中POD活性平均增加率（52.78%）与TN1（52.30%）无显著差异而显著低于RHT（154.53%），CAT活性平均增加率（26.24%）均显著高于RHT（-9.32%）和TN1（-14.18%），PAL活性平均增加率（3.80%）显著高于RHT（-32.01%）而显著低于TN1（74.03%）。【结论】月亮谷受白背飞虱取食胁迫后，其营养物质、次生产物及主要保护酶活性均较感虫品种TN1和抗虫品种RHT反应敏感，表现出强烈的防御反应，月亮谷可作为抗白背飞虱品种在田间应用。Abstract: 【Objective】To study the main defensive response of Acuce, a local rice variety in the Hani terraced fields in Yuanyang, Yunnan under the feeding stress of white-backed planthopper(WBPH), and to clarify its WBPH resistance mechanism.To provide a basis for rice insect-resistant breeding and utilization of insect-resistant germplasm resources.【Method】The contents of nutrient soluble sugar, secondary products malondialdehyde(MDA) and hydrogen peroxide(H2O2) in rice plants were determined by colorimetric method at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after WBPH feeding on Acuce, insect susceptible variety Taichung Native 1(TN1) and insect resistant variety Rathu Heenati(RHT) in the meantime, the main defense reaction of main protective enzyme activity including peroxidase(POD), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase(PAL) and catalase(CAT) were measured and analyzed.【Result】After WBPH feeding stress 3-96 h, the soluble sugar content of the Acuce increased by 93.19%.The increase rate was significantly lower than TN1(176.23%) (P< 0.05, the same as below), there was no significant difference with RHT(89.16%) (P> 0.05, the same as below).The increase rate of H2O2 content was 44.13%, significantly higher than TN1(13.18%) and significantly lower than RHT(83.01%).The content of MDA in the rice plant of Acuce increased, and the mean increase rate was 145.38%, significantly higher than that of TN1(36.84%) and RHT(57.06%).The activities of POD, CAT and PAL were increased after feeding stress.The mean increase rate of POD activity(52.78%) was not significantly different with TN1(52.30%), but was significantly lower than that of RHT(154.53%).The mean increase rate of CAT activity(26.24%) was significantly higher than that of RHT(-9.32%) and TN1(-14.18%).The mean increase rate of PAL activity(3.80%) was significantly higher than that of RHT(-32.01%) and significantly lower than that of TN1(74.03%).【Conclusion】After WBPH feeding, the local rice variety Acuce is more sensitive in nutrients, secondary substances, and major protective enzymes than the insect susceptible variety TN1 and resistant variety RHT, showing a strong defense response.Acuce can be used as the WBPH resistance varieties in the field.
-
Keywords:
- white-backed planthopper /
- rice /
- Acuce /
- nutrients /
- secondary products /
- defense enzymes /
- defence response
-
-
安钰, 沈应柏, 张志翔.2010.伤害胁迫对合作杨叶片膜质过氧化及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究, 17(5):241-244.[An Y, Shen Y B, Zhang Z X.2010.Effects of damage stress on membrane lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes in poplar leaves[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 17(5):241-244.] 陈建明, 俞晓平, 葛秀春, 吕仲贤, 程家安, 颜红岚, 刘光杰, 郑许松, 陶林勇, 孔令军.2000.水稻植株防御白背飞虱为害的某些生理反应[J].中国水稻科学, 14(1):43-47.[Chen J M, Yu X P, Ge X C, Lü Z X, Cheng J A, Yan H L, Liu G J, Zheng X S, Tao L Y, Kong L J.2000.Some physiological changes of rice plants infested by the whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera[J].Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 14(1):43-47.] 陈建明, 俞晓平, 吕仲贤, 郑许松, 徐红星, 程家安, 刘光杰.2003.水稻品种对白背飞虱的耐虫性反应及稻株营养成分的变化[J].应用生态学报, 14(12):2246-2250.[Chen J M, Yu X P, Lü Z X, Zheng X S, Xu H X, Cheng J A, Liu G J.2003.Tolerance of rice varieties to white-backed planthopper Sogatella furcifera and variation of nutrition components in rice plants[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 14(12):2246-2250.] 陈威, 周强, 李欣, 何国锋.2006.不同水稻品种对虫害胁迫的生理响应[J].生态学报, 26(7):2161-2166.[Chen W, Zhou Q, Li X, He G F.2006.Physiological responses of different rice cultivars under herbivore stress[J].Journal of Applied Ecology, 26(7):2161-2166.] 段灿星, 彭高松, 王晓鸣, 朱振东.2013.抗感水稻品种受灰飞虱为害后的生理反应差异[J].应用昆虫学报, 50(1):145-153.[Duan C X, Peng G S, Wang X M, Zhu Z D.2013.Differences in the physiological response of resistant and susceptible rice varieties infested by the small brown planthopper[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 50(1):145-153.] 弓少龙, 侯茂林.2017.水稻对褐飞虱和白背飞虱的抗性及其机制研究进展[J].植物保护, 43(1):15-23.[Gong S L, Hou M L.2017.Research progress in rice varietal resistance to the brown planthopper and white-backed planthopper[J].Plant Protection, 43(1):15-23.] 顾凡, 陈玲, 陈越, 赵昶灵, 肖素勤, 程在全.2020.水稻抗褐飞虱基因在物理图谱上的锚定[J].江西农业学报, 32(2):16-23.[Gu F, Chen L, Chen Y, Zhao C L, Xiao S Q, Cheng Z Q.2020.Anchorage of rice brown planthopper resistance gene on physical map[J].Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 32(2):16-23.] 郭祖国, 王梦馨, 崔林, 韩宝瑜.2018.6种防御酶调控植物体应答虫害胁迫机制的研究进展[J].应用生态学报, 29(12):4248-4258.[Guo Z G, Wang M X, Cui L, Han B Y.2018.Research progress on the underlying mechanisms of plant defense enzymes in response to pest stress[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29(12):4248-4258.] 黄所生, 吴碧球, 秦碧霞, 李战彪, 李成, 孙祖雄, 谢慧婷, 黄凤宽, 蔡健和.2016.白背飞虱对南方水稻黑条矮缩病传毒效率的影响[J].西南农业学报, 29(12):2840-2844.[Huang S S, Wu B Q, Qin B X, Li Z B, Li C, Sun Z X, Xie H T, Huang F K, Cai J H.2016.Effects of whiteback planthopper, Sogatella furcifera, Horváth on transmission rates of southern rice black streaked dwarf virus[J].Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Journal, 29(12):2840-2844.] 李再园, 王福莲, 田小海.2017.水稻对稻飞虱抵御机制研究[J].热带作物学报, 38(4):769-774.[Li Z Y, Wang F L, Tian X H.2017.The resistance mechanism of rice to rice plant hopper[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 38(4):769-774.] 刘晓丽, 娄永根.2018.褐飞虱与白背飞虱为害诱导水稻防御反应的比较[J].植物保护学报, 45(5):971-978.[Liu X L, Lou Y G.2018.Comparison of the defense responses in rice induced by brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens(Stål) and white-backed planthopper Sogatella furcifera(Horváth)[J].Journal of Plant Protection, 45(5):971-978.] 刘裕强, 江玲, 孙立宏, 王春明, 翟虎渠, 万建民.2005.褐飞虱刺吸诱导的水稻一些防御性酶活性的变化[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报, 31(6):643-650.[Liu Y Q, Jiang L, Sun L H, Wang C M, Zhai H Q, Wan J M.2005.Changes in some defensive enzyme activity induced by the piercing-sucking of brown planthopper in rice[J].Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 31(6):643-650.] 彭波, 彭宇, 彭娟, 孔冬艳, 何璐璐, 孙艳芳, 黄雅琴, 宋世枝.2018.水稻种子主要营养物质合成及调控研究与展望[J].热带作物学报, 39(6):1241-1251.[Peng B, Peng Y, Peng J, Kong D Y, He L L, Sun Y F, Huang Y Q, Song S Z.2018.Research advancement and prospects of main nutritious substances synthesis and regulation in rice seeds[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 39(6):1241-1251.] 沈君辉, 尚金梅, 刘光杰.2003.中国的白背飞虱研究概况[J].中国水稻科学, 17(S):7-22.[Shen J H, Shang J M, Liu G J.2003.Management of the white backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera in China:A mini-review[J].Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 17(S):7-22.] 孙凯, 钟乐荣, 丁文兵, 李有志.2014.水稻对白背飞虱取食胁迫的生理反应[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 40(5):501-505.[Sun K, Zhong L R, Ding W B, Li Y Z.2014.Physiological response in different rice varieties against Sogatella furcifera undergone feeding stress[J].Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences), 40(5):501-505.] 夏青, 沈梅.2014.元阳梯田红米百年不衰的原因及特性探析——以月亮谷为例[J].安徽农业科学, 42(30):10826-10828.[Xia Q, Shen M.2014.Analysis on reasons for red rice flourishing and its features from Yuanyang terrace-A case study of Moon Valley[J].Journal of Anhui agricultural science, 42(30):10826-10828.] 杨志奇, 杨春刚, 汤翠凤, 郭桂珍, 余腾琼, 张俊国, 曹桂兰, 阿新祥, 徐福荣, 张三元, 戴陆园, 韩龙植.2008.中国粳稻地方品种孕穗期耐冷性评价及聚类分析[J].植物遗传资源学报, 9(4):485-491.[Yang Z Q, Yang C G, Tang C F, Guo G Z, Yu T Q, Zhang J G, Cao G L, A X X, Xu F R, Zhang S Y, Dai L Y, Han L Z.2008.Evaluation of cold tolerance at booting stage and cluster analysis for Japonica rice landraces in China[J].Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 9(4):485-491.] 元阳县志编辑委员会.1990.元阳县志[M].贵阳:贵州民族出版社:94-127.[Editorial Committee of Yuanyang County Annuals.1990.Yuanyang County annuals[M].Guiyang:Guizhou Nationalities Press:94-127.] 曾亚文, 李自超, 申时全, 王象坤, 杨忠义, 张洪亮, 陈于敏.2001.云南地方稻种的多样性及优异种质研究[J].中国水稻科学, 15(3):169-174.[Zeng Y W, Li Z C, Shen S Q, Wang X K, Yang Z Y, Zhang H L, Chen Y M.2001.Diversity and good germplasm of indigenous rice varieties in Yunnan Province[J].Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 15(3):169-174.] 翟婉婉, 李雪萍, 徐返, 王扬, 刘胜, 刘永胜, 李成云, 王云月, 谢勇.2016.云南水稻地方品种月亮谷的群体多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报, 17(3):423-432.[Zhai W W, Li X P, Xu F, Wang Y, Liu S, Liu Y S, Li C Y, Wang Y Y, Xie Y.2016.Population characterization of rice landrace Acuce from Yunnan Province through phenotyping and genotyping[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 17(3):423-432.] 张海静, 严盈, 彭露, 郭建洋, 万方浩.2012.韧皮部取食昆虫诱导的植物防御反应[J].昆虫学报, 55(6):736-748.[Zhang H J, Yan Y, Peng L, Guo J Y, Wan F H.2012.Plant defense responses induced by phloem-feeding insects[J].Acta Entomologica Sinica, 55(6):736-748.] 张金锋, 薛庆中.2004.稻飞虱为害胁迫对水稻植株内主要保护酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科学, 37(10):1487-1491.[Zhang J F, Xue Q Z.2004.The activity dynamics of main protective enzymes in rice plants under feeding stresses of Sogatella furcifera and Nilaparvata lugens[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 37(10):1487-1491.] 张宽朝, 金青, 蔡永萍, 林毅.2008.苯丙氨酸解氨酶与其在重要次生代谢产物调控中的作用研究进展[J].中国农学通报, 24(12):59-62.[Zhang K C, Jin Q, Cai Y P, Lin Y.2008.Research progress of PAL and its control function of important secondav metabolltes[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 24(12):59-62.] 张腾国, 聂亭亭, 孙万仓, 史中飞, 王娟.2018.逆境胁迫对油菜谷胱甘肽还原酶基因表达及其酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报, 29(1):213-222.[Zhang T G, Nie T T, Sun W C, Shi Z F, Wang J.2018.Effects of diverse stresses on gene expression and enzyme activity of glutathione reductase in Brassica campestris[J].Journal of Applied Ecology, 29(1):213-222.] 张月白, 娄永根.2020.植物与植食性昆虫化学互作研究进展[J].应用生态学报, 31(7):2151-2160.[Zhang Y B, Lou Y G.2020.Research progress in chemical interactions between plants and phytophagous insects[J].Journal of App-lied Ecology, 31(7):2151-2160.] Bailly C, Benamar A, Corbineau F, Come D.1996.Changes in malondialdehyde content and in superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione reductase activities in sunflower seeds as related to deterioration during accelerated aging[J].Physiologia Plantarum, 97(1):104-110.
Dai L Y, Lin X H, Ye C R, Kazuo I, Koji S, Akira K, Xu F R, Yu T Q, Zhang D P.2004.Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling cold tolerance at the reproductive stage in Yunnan landrace of rice Kunming xiao bai gu[J].Breeding Science, 54(3):253-258.
Duan C X, Yu J J, Bai J Y, Zhu Z D, Wang X M.2014.Induced defense responses in rice plants against small brown planthopper infestation[J].The Crop Journal, 2(1):55-62.
He X H, Sun Y, Gao D, Wei F G, Pan L, Guo C W, Mao R Z, Xie Y, Li C Y, Zhu Y Y.2011.Comparison of agronomic traits between landraces and modern varieties at different altitudes in the paddy field of Yuanyang terrace, Yunnan Province[J].Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2(1):46-50.
Levine A, Tenhaken R, Dixon R, Lamb C.1994.H2O2 from the oxidative burst orchestrates the plant hypersensitive disease resistance response[J].Cell, 79(4):583-593.
Yang M, Lin J B, Cheng L, Zhou H L, Chen S, Liu F, Li R B, Qiu Y F.2020.Identification of a novel planthopper resistance gene from wild rice(Oryza rufipogon Griff.)[J].The Crop Journal, 8(6):1057-1070.
-
期刊类型引用(2)
1. 邱馨月，郅军锐，张涛，曾广. 钙离子和茉莉酸灌根对菜豆叶片防御酶活性和西花蓟马取食偏好性的影响. 植物保护. 2023(02): 192-200 . 
百度学术
2. 龙晓波，李为国，叶昌荣，程计华，张哲，尹合兴，赵健，李正和，曹桂元，易丽媛，罗正华，杨秀美，符岂玮，彭俊华，贾高峰，田冰川. 基于高密度SNP标记的云南元阳红米种质资源遗传多样性分析. 杂交水稻. 2022(04): 15-20 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
计量
- 文章访问数: 68
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 2
下载: