桂林喀斯特地区干湿循环过程中土壤水含量的空间变异

甘磊, 郑思文, 黄太庆, 陈晓冰, 包涵, 程芳丽, 陈廷速

甘磊, 郑思文, 黄太庆, 陈晓冰, 包涵, 程芳丽, 陈廷速. 2017: 桂林喀斯特地区干湿循环过程中土壤水含量的空间变异. 南方农业学报, 48(9): 1587-1593. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.09.08
引用本文: 甘磊, 郑思文, 黄太庆, 陈晓冰, 包涵, 程芳丽, 陈廷速. 2017: 桂林喀斯特地区干湿循环过程中土壤水含量的空间变异. 南方农业学报, 48(9): 1587-1593. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.09.08
GAN Lei, ZHENG Si-wen, HUANG Tai-qing, CHEN Xiao-bing, BAO Han, CHENG Fang-li, CHEN Ting-su. 2017: Spatial variation of soil water content under drying and wetting cycle in karst area of Guilin. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 48(9): 1587-1593. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.09.08
Citation: GAN Lei, ZHENG Si-wen, HUANG Tai-qing, CHEN Xiao-bing, BAO Han, CHENG Fang-li, CHEN Ting-su. 2017: Spatial variation of soil water content under drying and wetting cycle in karst area of Guilin. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 48(9): 1587-1593. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.09.08

桂林喀斯特地区干湿循环过程中土壤水含量的空间变异

基金项目: 

广西自然科学基金项目

国家自然科学基金项目

广西中青年教师基础能力提升项目

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: 45-1381/S

Spatial variation of soil water content under drying and wetting cycle in karst area of Guilin

  • 摘要: [目的]研究桂林喀斯特地区干湿循环过程中土壤水含量的空间分布变化,为解决该地区农田水土流失及农作物防旱抗旱提供理论依据.[方法]选取种植有大豆、梨树和甘蔗3种不同农作物的耕作地为试验地,分析3种试验地在干湿交替条件下土壤表层0~6 cm土壤水含量的空间变异,并利用地统计方法研究不同土地利用方式下的土壤空间分布变异.[结果]大豆、梨树和甘蔗3种试验地的土壤质地差异不显著(P>0.05),土壤容重表现为梨树地最小,但土壤有机质含量和总孔隙度均以梨树地最高.3种试验地湿润阶段的土壤水含量是干旱阶段土壤水含量的2~3倍.在整个干旱—湿润循环过程中,3种试验地的土壤水含量均表现为梨树地>甘蔗地>大豆地,土壤水含量空间分布比为37.18%~95.99%,呈中等偏上的空间相关性,说明试验地的空间分布在一定范围内表现稳定,但因不同的土地利用方式存在一定变异性,变异强度也因其耕作方式或管理方式的不同而异.[结论]桂林喀斯特地区土壤自身具有维持其土壤水含量空间分布稳定的能力,但耕作方式、灌溉等人为因素在一定程度上会削弱土壤水含量的空间稳定性.
    Abstract: [Objective] In this study,spatial variation of soil water content under drying and wetting cycle in karst area of Guilin was investigated to provide theoretical reference for solutions to soil and water loss and crop drought resistance in the area.[Method] Three plots cultivated with soybean,pear trees and sugarcane were investigated to analyze the spatial variation of soil water content in upper soil layer(0-6 cm) under alternate drying and wetting conditions,and the variation of soil spatial distribution under different land use patterns was studied by geostatistical method.[Result] The difference in soil texture among the three plots was not significant(P>0.05).Pear tree plot presented the lowest soil bulk density,but the greatest soil organic matter content and total porosity.The soil water content of these three plots during wet stage was nearly 2-3 times of the soil water content during dry stage.During the whole drying and wetting cycle,soil water contents of the three plots were pear tree plot>sugarcane plot>soybean plot.The proportion of spatial distribution of soil water content was 37.18%-95.99%,presenting a medium-high spatial correlation.It referred that the spatial distribution of plots was stable within a certain range.However,as different land use patterns resulted in certain variation,the variation intensity depended on tillage method or management mode.[Conclusion]The soil in karst area of Guilin has the capacity to maintain stability of spatial distribution in soil water content which can be weakened by human factors such as tillage method and irrigation to a certain extent.
  • 期刊类型引用(8)

    1. 赵政,王呈玉,米洋辰,韩华,冯秋苹,高云航,刘淑霞. 秸秆还田方式对土壤水分影响的机制. 江苏农业学报. 2024(05): 835-845 . 百度学术
    2. 刘洢杋,杨峻晖,刘家齐,陆慧飞,葛茜盈,王盈涵,林正艺,宋柏君,段敏. 喀斯特和非喀斯特森林植物磷含量及土壤无机磷分级特征比较. 南方农业学报. 2023(01): 110-118 . 本站查看
    3. 魏雨涵,钱建平,范伟伟,李彭. 基于RSEI的漓江流域生态环境质量动态监测. 中国水土保持科学(中英文). 2021(01): 122-131 . 百度学术
    4. 王忠云,宋燕平,喻阳华,郭松. 石漠化地区土壤含水率的动态变化特征及其影响因素. 西南农业学报. 2021(03): 591-596 . 百度学术
    5. 莫燕华,邹涵,马姜明,李玉凤,菅瑞,秦佳双,宋尊荣,林正忠. 喀斯特石山不同演替阶段檵木群落土壤温湿度变化. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(03): 122-130 . 百度学术
    6. 陈海生,王可,刘国顺. 豫中烟区烟叶烟碱含量与土壤颗粒组成的空间变异性. 河南农业科学. 2019(01): 44-49 . 百度学术
    7. 张鹏飞,钞锦龙,戴燕燕,赵景波. 黄河中段不同河流阶地枣树林土壤水分的特征. 江西农业学报. 2019(07): 51-56 . 百度学术
    8. 甘磊,朱彦光,严磊,李振东,陈廷速,陈晓冰. 不同耕作方式下甘蔗地土壤热容量的变化. 西南农业学报. 2018(08): 1676-1681 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(4)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  10
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 12
出版历程
  • 刊出日期:  2017-09-29

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回